BENEDICT XVI The Grand Inquisitor
was an anonymous day of October, when the Panzerkardinal (now Benedict XVI), envious of the success television, publishing and media to Drewermann internationally in 1991, suspends him from the teaching of the History of Religion at the Catholic Faculty of the University of Paderborn (Germany-Westphalia). Drewermann, author of some seventy texts, translated into 14 languages, went on however his career as a psychotherapist and as a professor of Sociology and Cultural Anthropology at the University. His mistake was, according to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, that he had not played in a historical and literary sacred texts, but they have introduced concepts mediated by the archetypal symbolism of Jung's depth psychology and psychoanalysis Freud and dalle opere letterarie e poetiche e dalle scienze neurologiche. Questa esegesi lo aveva condotto a riconoscere quello che ogni intellettuale onesto avrebbe sostenuto, contro ogni dogma vaticanesco, ovvero che le cosiddette verità storiche del cattolicesimo non sono altro che una forzatura. Esse sono miti e racconti che hanno un valore puramente simbolico, dunque un valore non reale ma di un messaggio che va al di là della lettera. Insomma, se si parla di Cristo che morì a 33 anni, quel numero rimanda, in verità, al percorso esoterico (le 33 vertebre della spina dorsale) che egli fece per liberarsi del suo vecchio modo di pensare (la morte), mutato poi nel nuovo modo di esistere (la vita nell’amore).
Ma ciò che ancor più sent on a rampage, the Prefect and the Black Church that is behind (Opus Dei) are the positions Drewermann on priestly celibacy, abortion, ordination of women and sexual morality, the usual dilemmas that homophobic and sexual phobia do not even want to hear name, to avoid falling into an existential despair that would force them to recognize the futility of their existence and of their malice, intended solely to cover the outstanding problems of the apostles failed. What shocked the very Casta Romana was the book, published in 1991, "Clerks: psychodrama of an ideal, where the author complains of the removal mechanisms operating at an unconscious level in the priests. The picture emerges from his twenty-year psychotherapist of many religious activities is nothing short of alarming: removal and lead compensation to enter the seminary in appearing ecclesiastical, which represents for him a protection for its insecurity and psychological weakness to face the real world. And if not alien to the very few clerical vocations is the inability to solve problems related to sexuality, conversely, the vocation of salvation is the result of a visceral attachment to the mother, perverse and immature, as has been observed in the case of Wojtyla. The Mother Church thus becomes a kind of womb that protects from the need to find a solution to their sexual impulses. Hence, the vow of chastity and religious obedience that allows you to remove the problem, pretending that no longer exists (that is, many cases of child abuse?). When the archbishop of Paderborn
made the announcement to the press for the suspension of Eugen Drewermann, said that "after years of deep concern for harmony with the teachings of questionable beliefs of the Church" had decided to suspend him indefinitely and "to new order. " And Drewermann said: "It is ironic that a measure adopted Archbishop Degenhardt on the orders of the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger, calling the measure as" a degeneration of theology into an ideology of administrative power that proposes itself as truth. " In fact, the suspension was accompanied by threats of excommunication, which did not touch the human spirit and the least libertarian of the German theologian who said, "As a priest are committed to the truth, not in peace." So you have to ask "if God is the force that makes man free, or the basis of an absolutist regime" and draw the necessary consequences. The hierarchy
Ekklesiastica take note of its eternal and silent errors dramatically, in fact, not just talk, the way it operates. Learn from what Giordano Bruno, four centuries after his "abbrugiamento" The sends word to mouth of Drewermann:
"The Church has been closed for so long to the pure breath of thought, that its wells and its galleries are full of rotting for centuries, just one spark to blow up like a powder keg all autoistupidimento this doctrine imposed from above. "
by: RELIGION AS THE CHURCH THAT KILLS
FWD THE FATE OF HUMANITY
(Nexus Edizioni), May, 2010.
544 pages, 167 pictures, € 25
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri/la-religione-che-uccide.php
http: / / shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
http://alessiodibenedetto.blogspot.com/2010/04/fuori-della-chiesa-non-ce-salvezza.html
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
Doctor Touch Your Cock
OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE 'S SALVATION??
“Extra ecclesiam nulla salus” (“Fuori della chiesa non c’è salvezza”) . Questa frase dei primi padri della chiesa è stata ripetuta da Ratzinger come dogma irrinunciabile del fondamentalismo cattolico. Egli, partendo da questa premessa (tutta “sua”, senza alcuna base né storica, né scientifica se non la sua tradizione) attacca direttamente l’Umanesimo, il Rinascimento, l’Illuminismo, la scienza e la medicina moderne in quanto causa di irresponsabili sciagure per l’uomo contemporaneo. Considera la filosofia occidentale come una visione the world tends to trample on human life, through the exaltation of "libertinism" and the personal freedom and individual conscience, which must be eliminated completely abandoned his Church, which included all the mysteries of Heaven and Earth . In short, we are unbelievers fools as he, together with the whole gang of "intellectuals" clerical, represent the cutting edge of higher thought. This means that if an inhabitant of the planet's accession to the Catholic church is not saved. Fair love for others. How much hypocrisy behind some compassionate racism, which judges behind the scenes all non-Catholics as "poor." How many false proclamations of love for mankind. How much duplicity to the carriers of different values \u200b\u200bof religiosity. How much irony in relation to different conceptions of life and to the hundreds of other "churches" that no Christian need not feel offended for holders of its truth: if you do not kneel in front of monsignors, if not hear any mention of them as a stray dog \u200b\u200blies down on the steps of his house, where a false ousted the true master, you will be condemned to hell.
Friedrich Nietzsche would have said: "All the work of the ancient world to prepare a scientific civilization and freedom there was [violently] defrauded by Christianity" . For its part, Emile Cioran would have said: "To be free is to get rid forever of the idea of \u200b\u200breward, and not just give up this world and all worlds, but also to salvation, and crush even the idea of \u200b\u200bthe chain between the chains ". Affranchiamoci therefore the concept of prohibition and the premium and we will finally be released from death, happy to travel back in the game of life eternal in "Another round of Joust," as he sings one of the novels by Tiziano Terzani.
regained its hero who was inside of us at the time of pre-Christian Celts and Romans. Remove the fear of other sizes, probably because we are living in many other universes simultaneously, and this is the orthogonal projection of the other, more ethereal, more decent. Drove out the demons of fear that imprison us, making us slaves in this and the different space-time bubbles. Be proud of your way of being and thinking. Not delegated to others your earthly life, your dignity, your real surge of union with the Universal All and All. "Likewise, the American poet and writer Herman Melville (1819-91), author of adventure novel Moby-Dick:
" Faith, like a jackal, feeds among the tombs, searching, and just the remains of these doubts collects its hope more vital. "
by: RELIGION HOW THE CHURCH THAT KILLS
FWD THE FATE OF HUMANITY (Nexus, May, 2010)
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri / la-religion-that-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
“Extra ecclesiam nulla salus” (“Fuori della chiesa non c’è salvezza”) . Questa frase dei primi padri della chiesa è stata ripetuta da Ratzinger come dogma irrinunciabile del fondamentalismo cattolico. Egli, partendo da questa premessa (tutta “sua”, senza alcuna base né storica, né scientifica se non la sua tradizione) attacca direttamente l’Umanesimo, il Rinascimento, l’Illuminismo, la scienza e la medicina moderne in quanto causa di irresponsabili sciagure per l’uomo contemporaneo. Considera la filosofia occidentale come una visione the world tends to trample on human life, through the exaltation of "libertinism" and the personal freedom and individual conscience, which must be eliminated completely abandoned his Church, which included all the mysteries of Heaven and Earth . In short, we are unbelievers fools as he, together with the whole gang of "intellectuals" clerical, represent the cutting edge of higher thought. This means that if an inhabitant of the planet's accession to the Catholic church is not saved. Fair love for others. How much hypocrisy behind some compassionate racism, which judges behind the scenes all non-Catholics as "poor." How many false proclamations of love for mankind. How much duplicity to the carriers of different values \u200b\u200bof religiosity. How much irony in relation to different conceptions of life and to the hundreds of other "churches" that no Christian need not feel offended for holders of its truth: if you do not kneel in front of monsignors, if not hear any mention of them as a stray dog \u200b\u200blies down on the steps of his house, where a false ousted the true master, you will be condemned to hell.
Friedrich Nietzsche would have said: "All the work of the ancient world to prepare a scientific civilization and freedom there was [violently] defrauded by Christianity" . For its part, Emile Cioran would have said: "To be free is to get rid forever of the idea of \u200b\u200breward, and not just give up this world and all worlds, but also to salvation, and crush even the idea of \u200b\u200bthe chain between the chains ". Affranchiamoci therefore the concept of prohibition and the premium and we will finally be released from death, happy to travel back in the game of life eternal in "Another round of Joust," as he sings one of the novels by Tiziano Terzani.
regained its hero who was inside of us at the time of pre-Christian Celts and Romans. Remove the fear of other sizes, probably because we are living in many other universes simultaneously, and this is the orthogonal projection of the other, more ethereal, more decent. Drove out the demons of fear that imprison us, making us slaves in this and the different space-time bubbles. Be proud of your way of being and thinking. Not delegated to others your earthly life, your dignity, your real surge of union with the Universal All and All. "Likewise, the American poet and writer Herman Melville (1819-91), author of adventure novel Moby-Dick:
" Faith, like a jackal, feeds among the tombs, searching, and just the remains of these doubts collects its hope more vital. "
by: RELIGION HOW THE CHURCH THAT KILLS
FWD THE FATE OF HUMANITY (Nexus, May, 2010)
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri / la-religion-that-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Eggs
living wills
Hanns Küng (19/03/1928) is a Swiss theologian vanguard
known internationally for his numerous writings critical of the Church of Rome.
recently republished in Italy "The dignity of death. Thesis Euthanasia", Rome, Datanews, 2007.
About ethics of medical care, Küng says in his book on the dignity of dying:
"What man does not have a duty to preserve one's life through exceptional means is a classic axiom of moral theology. No patient in any case has an ethical duty to undergo any therapy and any operation that prolongs its life. (...) And patients' rights to decide freely whether or not to undergo certain medical treatments. No doctor has the duty to prolong human life at any cost, thus meeting a prolonged agony. "
And then again: "No man should be forced to continue living at all costs. The law can not continue to live become a duty, the right to life does not amount to coercion to live (...). There are so many awful cases in which it is quite understandable that the patient is able to say: "My condition is intolerable. My greatest wish is to die ...". How, in such cases, a man assume the right to decide over life and death of another, forcing him to continue to live and suffer? Certainly the desire to die by the patient for the physician is only necessary but not sufficient to justify active euthanasia: the fundamental reason must be the only "good" patient, as well as himself (and not the doctor or another person) sees it. "
Moreover, "the practice of euthanasia rests solely with the doctor, who is able to provide the patient a peaceful death, not unhappy or sad, (...) the doctor should seek advice from a colleague (outside? And close relatives?) about the seriousness of the request, the correctness of the assessment of the condition of the patient and the person responsible for completion of terminal medical practices. "
words hot for our center-right government, especially after the case Eluana. Words even more pressing because they come from one of the leading experts in theology at the international level. Words that, if repeated in the interview that Lucia Annunziata asked him to TG2 (2/20/2009), passed unheeded by those who make decrees during the night to meet the dictates and orders of the dictatorial Vatican!
The details of the "theologian uncomfortable" leave no doubt on the relationship between Church and State:
- H. Küng: "There are two aspects: the legal aspect of the theological aspect. The legal aspect is that in a democratic state, the church, church authorities must comply with the laws, owe obedience to the Constitutional Court and in this sense I think the issue is decided, and I do not understand why the church put pressure on the prime minister. I hope that the Head of State rifiuti un tale intervento. Veniamo alla questione della teologia morale. Io l’ho scritto in questo libro Sulla dignità del morire riguardo ad una eutanasia indiretta conseguita mediante la sospensione dei mezzi di sostentamento artificiale della vita: l’uomo non ha l’obbligo di conservarsi in vita attraverso mezzi eccezionali; questo è un classico assioma della teologia morale. Infatti è questo che ho imparato come studente alla Pontificia Università Gregoriana, cioè che nessuna persona sia forzata ad applicare mezzi straordinari, e in questo caso è molto chiaro evidentemente, la ragazza stessa, la povera ragazza, non può decidere, però suo padre può e deve decidere».
- L. Annunziata: «Questo means that you disagree with what the Vatican says about this case? ".
- H. Küng: "Mah. there is a decree of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1980 where it is expressly mentioned everything I just said. I do not think so, at this point, to disagree with official doctrine. "
But the Swiss theologian's doctrinal clashes against the opportunism of the chaste Vatican are not so recent. Since 1970
Hanns Küng papal infallibility declared inadmissible. So the calls received in 1975 by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In mid-December 1979, following all'inasprirsi the tone of the dispute, the Congregation declared the professor guilty of "diversion" from the "whole truth about the Church, by withdrawing the mission canonical (official permission to teach theology). It seems that, according to the authoritative voices of the Vatican curia and Bavarian archdiocese, this first sentence, which took place during the pontificate of John Paul II, convicted of high symbolic value because it faces one of the most influential members of the progressive Catholic thought, it was desired and orchestrated by Ratzinger, a colleague of Küng in Tübingen at the turn of the '68 riots. At that time, the classroom of the future pope was half empty, while the the professor's packed, since they brought forward innovative ideas that have always captured the hearts of young people.
no coincidence that Ratzinger was pleased with the decision, when he said in this regard: "The Christian believer is a simple person, and the bishops must protect their faith by the power of intellectuals." But the text that most diatribes produced no end of the program was exposed in the restoration of medieval book report on the Faith in 1985, when Ratzinger, invokes and reaffirms, in agreement with Opus Dei, the absolute power of Casta Ekklesiastica to eliminate any residue of democratic openness desired by John XXIII at Vatican II. With reference to the Report, Küng notes: "It saddens me and makes me angry with what is happening in the eighties in our Church, after the many hopes raised by the explosion in the seventies to reconcile." In particular, he wrote, in no uncertain terms: "Joseph Ratzinger is afraid. And like Dostoevsky's Grand Inquisitor, he fears nothing more than freedom. Back to the old music in Rome: a Ratzinger curial power again appears a divine privilege, criticism and opposition is not expected. (...) The "Prefect of the faith" that defends the necessity of excommunication, never ruled against criminals "Catholics" well known as Adolf Hitler and the dictators of Latin America, here is a clear threat against critics of Catholic theologians (...)
not burn any more, but if you must, you are ready to wipe out mentally and professionally. (...)
The methods are the same: the demonization of the opponent as a cause of confusion, which would disrupt the sacred order. (...) Often the use of ambiguous conflicts and false fronts, that experience anywhere close to heresy. It reflects the arrogance of power here now from the former professor denies any theological authority to the episcopal conferences (uncomfortable): (...) believes he could present to the world as embodied in the rule of orthodoxy Catholic: "La vérité catholique c'est moi [The Catholic truth I am]. (...)
comes to mind quite often proclaimed the sympathy of the Vatican for Catholics totalitarian regimes and the concordat with Hitler (1933), which still ensures the German hierarchy, legally and financially, in an untouchable position of power companies, almost a 'state within a state'. (...) The tragic silence of the German el'accondiscendenza towards Nazism (...). "
The Inquisition, therefore, only the methods have changed and the name, but not their own principles and purposes: "procedure secret, refusal vision of documents, legal aid and the appeal: the same authority as prosecutor and judge. It's back to work - Küng continues - at full capacity, especially against the North American moralists, the dogmatists of Central Europe, the African and Latin American theologians of liberation. " He claimed, moreover, dangerous interference with the Opus Dei not only in doctrine, but also financial (was still under the scandal-Calvi-IOR-Marcinkus Sindona) "is favored by all means the English secret organization Opus Dei , theologically and politically reactionary institution, mixed up in banks, universities and governments, che ostenta tratti medievali e controriformistici e che questo Papa [Wojtyla], il quale le era vicino già a Cracovia, ha sottratto al controllo dei vescovi [nominandola Prelatura personale, ossia un’organizzazione segretissima che rende conto unicamente al Papa]”.
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri/la-religione-che-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
Hanns Küng (19/03/1928) is a Swiss theologian vanguard
known internationally for his numerous writings critical of the Church of Rome.
recently republished in Italy "The dignity of death. Thesis Euthanasia", Rome, Datanews, 2007.
About ethics of medical care, Küng says in his book on the dignity of dying:
"What man does not have a duty to preserve one's life through exceptional means is a classic axiom of moral theology. No patient in any case has an ethical duty to undergo any therapy and any operation that prolongs its life. (...) And patients' rights to decide freely whether or not to undergo certain medical treatments. No doctor has the duty to prolong human life at any cost, thus meeting a prolonged agony. "
And then again: "No man should be forced to continue living at all costs. The law can not continue to live become a duty, the right to life does not amount to coercion to live (...). There are so many awful cases in which it is quite understandable that the patient is able to say: "My condition is intolerable. My greatest wish is to die ...". How, in such cases, a man assume the right to decide over life and death of another, forcing him to continue to live and suffer? Certainly the desire to die by the patient for the physician is only necessary but not sufficient to justify active euthanasia: the fundamental reason must be the only "good" patient, as well as himself (and not the doctor or another person) sees it. "
Moreover, "the practice of euthanasia rests solely with the doctor, who is able to provide the patient a peaceful death, not unhappy or sad, (...) the doctor should seek advice from a colleague (outside? And close relatives?) about the seriousness of the request, the correctness of the assessment of the condition of the patient and the person responsible for completion of terminal medical practices. "
words hot for our center-right government, especially after the case Eluana. Words even more pressing because they come from one of the leading experts in theology at the international level. Words that, if repeated in the interview that Lucia Annunziata asked him to TG2 (2/20/2009), passed unheeded by those who make decrees during the night to meet the dictates and orders of the dictatorial Vatican!
The details of the "theologian uncomfortable" leave no doubt on the relationship between Church and State:
- H. Küng: "There are two aspects: the legal aspect of the theological aspect. The legal aspect is that in a democratic state, the church, church authorities must comply with the laws, owe obedience to the Constitutional Court and in this sense I think the issue is decided, and I do not understand why the church put pressure on the prime minister. I hope that the Head of State rifiuti un tale intervento. Veniamo alla questione della teologia morale. Io l’ho scritto in questo libro Sulla dignità del morire riguardo ad una eutanasia indiretta conseguita mediante la sospensione dei mezzi di sostentamento artificiale della vita: l’uomo non ha l’obbligo di conservarsi in vita attraverso mezzi eccezionali; questo è un classico assioma della teologia morale. Infatti è questo che ho imparato come studente alla Pontificia Università Gregoriana, cioè che nessuna persona sia forzata ad applicare mezzi straordinari, e in questo caso è molto chiaro evidentemente, la ragazza stessa, la povera ragazza, non può decidere, però suo padre può e deve decidere».
- L. Annunziata: «Questo means that you disagree with what the Vatican says about this case? ".
- H. Küng: "Mah. there is a decree of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1980 where it is expressly mentioned everything I just said. I do not think so, at this point, to disagree with official doctrine. "
But the Swiss theologian's doctrinal clashes against the opportunism of the chaste Vatican are not so recent. Since 1970
Hanns Küng papal infallibility declared inadmissible. So the calls received in 1975 by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In mid-December 1979, following all'inasprirsi the tone of the dispute, the Congregation declared the professor guilty of "diversion" from the "whole truth about the Church, by withdrawing the mission canonical (official permission to teach theology). It seems that, according to the authoritative voices of the Vatican curia and Bavarian archdiocese, this first sentence, which took place during the pontificate of John Paul II, convicted of high symbolic value because it faces one of the most influential members of the progressive Catholic thought, it was desired and orchestrated by Ratzinger, a colleague of Küng in Tübingen at the turn of the '68 riots. At that time, the classroom of the future pope was half empty, while the the professor's packed, since they brought forward innovative ideas that have always captured the hearts of young people.
no coincidence that Ratzinger was pleased with the decision, when he said in this regard: "The Christian believer is a simple person, and the bishops must protect their faith by the power of intellectuals." But the text that most diatribes produced no end of the program was exposed in the restoration of medieval book report on the Faith in 1985, when Ratzinger, invokes and reaffirms, in agreement with Opus Dei, the absolute power of Casta Ekklesiastica to eliminate any residue of democratic openness desired by John XXIII at Vatican II. With reference to the Report, Küng notes: "It saddens me and makes me angry with what is happening in the eighties in our Church, after the many hopes raised by the explosion in the seventies to reconcile." In particular, he wrote, in no uncertain terms: "Joseph Ratzinger is afraid. And like Dostoevsky's Grand Inquisitor, he fears nothing more than freedom. Back to the old music in Rome: a Ratzinger curial power again appears a divine privilege, criticism and opposition is not expected. (...) The "Prefect of the faith" that defends the necessity of excommunication, never ruled against criminals "Catholics" well known as Adolf Hitler and the dictators of Latin America, here is a clear threat against critics of Catholic theologians (...)
not burn any more, but if you must, you are ready to wipe out mentally and professionally. (...)
The methods are the same: the demonization of the opponent as a cause of confusion, which would disrupt the sacred order. (...) Often the use of ambiguous conflicts and false fronts, that experience anywhere close to heresy. It reflects the arrogance of power here now from the former professor denies any theological authority to the episcopal conferences (uncomfortable): (...) believes he could present to the world as embodied in the rule of orthodoxy Catholic: "La vérité catholique c'est moi [The Catholic truth I am]. (...)
comes to mind quite often proclaimed the sympathy of the Vatican for Catholics totalitarian regimes and the concordat with Hitler (1933), which still ensures the German hierarchy, legally and financially, in an untouchable position of power companies, almost a 'state within a state'. (...) The tragic silence of the German el'accondiscendenza towards Nazism (...). "
The Inquisition, therefore, only the methods have changed and the name, but not their own principles and purposes: "procedure secret, refusal vision of documents, legal aid and the appeal: the same authority as prosecutor and judge. It's back to work - Küng continues - at full capacity, especially against the North American moralists, the dogmatists of Central Europe, the African and Latin American theologians of liberation. " He claimed, moreover, dangerous interference with the Opus Dei not only in doctrine, but also financial (was still under the scandal-Calvi-IOR-Marcinkus Sindona) "is favored by all means the English secret organization Opus Dei , theologically and politically reactionary institution, mixed up in banks, universities and governments, che ostenta tratti medievali e controriformistici e che questo Papa [Wojtyla], il quale le era vicino già a Cracovia, ha sottratto al controllo dei vescovi [nominandola Prelatura personale, ossia un’organizzazione segretissima che rende conto unicamente al Papa]”.
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri/la-religione-che-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
Gpsphone Walk Through Walls
WE HAD THE WORST TEACHERS FROM TWO THOUSAND YEARS TO THIS PART
Se il Governo della Chiesa fosse restato ad Avignone, così come accadde per miracolo per circa settant’anni dal 1309 al 1377, senz’altro l’Italia Today's ideas would be led by less hypocritical, and unworthy arbitration. We had two thousand years for the worst teachers that were available in the world. These are the results. There are no longer free citizens, but a flock Abul parentopola compliant with the recommendation that looks like the only way out for their survival on earth. A nation reduced to a barnyard pig and all sorts of abuse perpetrated by the wealthy of yesterday and today and the caste of rulers, always in cahoots with the confessional monsignors and prelates of every stripe, the principle has always been: we must forgive rich entrepreneurs who exploit you, and instead of the pension, they give you cancer. Ah
if the government of the church Catholic had remained at Avignon, but the French are a different people, do not tolerate the harassment of white and black skirts (the Jesuits and Opus Dei). How many times have we dreamed of waking up without having more than sewer beyond the Tiber (which has happened with everything from financial crimes to murders, from war planning to pedophilia). How many times have we thought that, perhaps, the dignitaries of the Holy See could receive for "merits sexual a just American citizens. "It can be done?". Of course not! The truth is that nobody wants them, yet they are binding with a threatening, compared to which the communist dictatorships are Alice in Wonderland. But their conviction that it is more hidden and comes from when we baptized in the fetid their church that stands on every corner of a country whose spirit is occupied by a Papal Tyranny part of the national DNA, now branded dall'inginocchiatoio, and fumes from the censers of incense. And he continues to talk about debt? If you are tracing each year, 13 billion € a confessional party patronage continues to donate to the Vatican City, removing them with a lie from the pockets of poor people, if you retrieve all the revenues by ICI (property values \u200b\u200bVatican amounted to default 30 billion euro), to stop talking about the national debt (another hoax), crises delle pensioni, di tagli ai rinnovi contrattuali, alla sanità, alla scuola pubblica, all’arte, alla musica e allo spettacolo… Che misero spettacolo di politici ingordi che raschiano fino in fondo al loro pastone per maiali! L’aristocrazia francese prerivoluzionaria era molto più benevola!
da: LA RELIGIONE CHE UCCIDE
COME LA CHIESA DEVIA IL DESTINO DELL’UMANITÀ
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri/la-religione-che-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
Se il Governo della Chiesa fosse restato ad Avignone, così come accadde per miracolo per circa settant’anni dal 1309 al 1377, senz’altro l’Italia Today's ideas would be led by less hypocritical, and unworthy arbitration. We had two thousand years for the worst teachers that were available in the world. These are the results. There are no longer free citizens, but a flock Abul parentopola compliant with the recommendation that looks like the only way out for their survival on earth. A nation reduced to a barnyard pig and all sorts of abuse perpetrated by the wealthy of yesterday and today and the caste of rulers, always in cahoots with the confessional monsignors and prelates of every stripe, the principle has always been: we must forgive rich entrepreneurs who exploit you, and instead of the pension, they give you cancer. Ah
if the government of the church Catholic had remained at Avignon, but the French are a different people, do not tolerate the harassment of white and black skirts (the Jesuits and Opus Dei). How many times have we dreamed of waking up without having more than sewer beyond the Tiber (which has happened with everything from financial crimes to murders, from war planning to pedophilia). How many times have we thought that, perhaps, the dignitaries of the Holy See could receive for "merits sexual a just American citizens. "It can be done?". Of course not! The truth is that nobody wants them, yet they are binding with a threatening, compared to which the communist dictatorships are Alice in Wonderland. But their conviction that it is more hidden and comes from when we baptized in the fetid their church that stands on every corner of a country whose spirit is occupied by a Papal Tyranny part of the national DNA, now branded dall'inginocchiatoio, and fumes from the censers of incense. And he continues to talk about debt? If you are tracing each year, 13 billion € a confessional party patronage continues to donate to the Vatican City, removing them with a lie from the pockets of poor people, if you retrieve all the revenues by ICI (property values \u200b\u200bVatican amounted to default 30 billion euro), to stop talking about the national debt (another hoax), crises delle pensioni, di tagli ai rinnovi contrattuali, alla sanità, alla scuola pubblica, all’arte, alla musica e allo spettacolo… Che misero spettacolo di politici ingordi che raschiano fino in fondo al loro pastone per maiali! L’aristocrazia francese prerivoluzionaria era molto più benevola!
da: LA RELIGIONE CHE UCCIDE
COME LA CHIESA DEVIA IL DESTINO DELL’UMANITÀ
http://alessiodibenedetto.jimdo.com/novita-2010/
http://www.macroedizioni.it/libri/la-religione-che-uccide.php
http://shop.nexusedizioni.it/index.php/controller/product/product_id/424
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)